Vulnerability Management Tool Comparison

Qualys VMDR, Tenable One, Rapid7 InsightVM, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, CrowdStrike Falcon, Wiz, Orca, Ivanti Neurons, ManageEngine and Greenbone/OpenVAS compared side by side — capabilities, deployment models, published pricing and 72 enterprise RFP questions.

Research date: August 27, 2026

Filter platforms

Capability

Reset

Platform category — any

Leave every box clear to match any.

Deployment model — any

Leave every box clear to match any.

Discovery / scanning method — any

Leave every box clear to match any.

Best-fit company size — any

Leave every box clear to match any.

10 of 10 platforms match the selected filters. The Cisco/Kenna lifecycle warning above is shown separately and is never in these filters or the comparison table.

Executive comparison

Vulnerability management platforms matching the current filters
PlatformCategoryDeployment DiscoveryBuilt-in PatchGov / FedRAMP Best Fit
Qualys VMDR Traditional enterprise VMSaaS, Private platform (limited on-prem-style option)Agent, Network scanner, Passive discovery, Agentless cloud Yes* Yes Mid-market through very large global enterprise — large hybrid networks, distributed endpoints, multiple countries, strong compliance requirements, agent + scanner strategy, and mature VM teams wanting asset inventory + VM + patch in one platform.
Tenable One Vulnerability Management Traditional enterprise VMSaaS, On-premises (Security Center)Agent, Network scanner, Agentless cloud Yes Yes Mid-market through very large enterprise — especially organizations familiar with Nessus, hybrid environments, scanner + agent models, on-prem Security Center needs, and regulated/high-security environments.
Rapid7 InsightVM / Exposure Command Traditional enterprise VMSaaS, On-premises (Security Console/engines)Agent, Network scanner, Agentless cloud No / integration Not itemized Mid-market through large enterprise.
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Endpoint-led exposure / vulnerability managementSaaSAgent, Agentless cloud No / integration Not itemized SMB through very large enterprise — especially organizations already standardized on Microsoft 365, Defender for Endpoint, Defender for Servers, Defender XDR, Intune, and Azure/Defender for Cloud.
CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management Endpoint-led exposure / vulnerability managementSaaSAgent, Network scanner, Agentless cloud No / integration Yes Mid-market through very large enterprise — especially existing CrowdStrike customers, CTEM programs, endpoint-heavy estates, and enterprises wanting vulnerability data tied to adversary intelligence.
Wiz Unified Vulnerability Management Cloud-native VM / CNAPPSaaSAgentless cloud, Optional sensor No / integration Not itemized Mid-market through very large enterprise with significant cloud infrastructure.
Orca Security Cloud Vulnerability Management Cloud-native VM / CNAPPSaaSAgentless cloud, Optional sensor No / integration Yes Mid-market through global enterprise with meaningful cloud workloads.
Ivanti Neurons for Risk-Based Vulnerability Management Risk aggregation / prioritization / orchestrationSaaSAggregates other sources (no native scanner) No / integration Not itemized Large and very large enterprise, especially organizations with multiple vulnerability scanners, AppSec scanners, pen-test findings, cloud-security tools, multiple business units, and a need for one normalized enterprise risk view.
ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus Endpoint VM + patch managementSaaS, On-premisesAgent, Network scanner Yes Not itemized SMB through mid-market; potentially larger cost-conscious enterprises with endpoint-focused requirements.
Greenbone / OpenVAS Scanner-centric / self-hosted open sourceOn-premises, Self-hosted / air-gappedNetwork scanner No / integration Not itemized Small and mid-size organizations, labs, security researchers, privacy-conscious environments, organizations with Linux/security-engineering expertise, and teams needing a lower-cost self-hosted scanner.

* Built-in patch requires the separately licensed Qualys Patch Management module. Qualys VMDR alone identifies missing patches but does not deploy them.

Pricing snapshot

Pricing basis and published or estimated figure per platform
PlatformPricing basisPublished / estimated figure
Qualys VMDRPublished Price (SMB packages) + quote-based enterprisePublished Price: VMDR TruRisk from $2,195; TruRisk FixIT from $2,995; TruRisk ProtectIT from $4,645 (SMB packages). Enterprise VMDR pricing is quote-based and per asset.
Tenable One Vulnerability ManagementPublished PricePublished Price: 100 assets — 1 year $3,500, 2 years $6,825, 3 years $9,975.
Rapid7 InsightVM / Exposure CommandPublished PricePublished Price: starts at $1.62/asset/month at 500 assets (~$9,720/year for 500 assets before add-ons, services, taxes, or discounts).
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability ManagementPublished PricePublished Price: Standalone $3.00/user/month (annual commitment); add-on $2.00/user/month (annual commitment) for eligible Defender for Endpoint Plan 2 / Microsoft 365 E5 customers.
CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure ManagementEstimated (quote-driven)Estimated: quote/demo-driven; budget as a five-figure-or-larger annual enterprise purchase depending on endpoint count/modules. Do not treat any specific number as official.
Wiz Unified Vulnerability ManagementQuote-based (modular)Wiz's pricing page states licensing is modular and scales on metrics such as workloads, developers, log ingestion, or sensors depending on product. No simple public per-asset VM price should be assumed.
Orca Security Cloud Vulnerability ManagementQuote-basedCommercial pricing is quote/demo-driven. Do not assume or invent a public list price.
Ivanti Neurons for Risk-Based Vulnerability ManagementQuote-basedQuote-based. Estimated: budget as an enterprise risk-management/orchestration layer; final cost depends heavily on asset volume, modules, and bundled Ivanti products.
ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager PlusPublished PricePublished Price (100 computers/1 technician): Professional — on-prem annual $695, cloud annual $895. Enterprise — on-prem annual $1,195, cloud annual $1,545. Product page also lists Professional from ~$0.90/device/month and Enterprise from ~$1.55/device/month.
Greenbone / OpenVASPublished Price + open sourcePublished Price: OPENVAS BASIC (entry-level enterprise product) — €2,524/year. The underlying Greenbone Community Edition / OpenVAS stack is open source and free to run, though operating it still incurs infrastructure and labor costs.

Before you rely on this

Important disclaimer

Vulnerability Management Vendor Disclaimer: EVULNABLE provides independent informational comparisons of vulnerability-management and exposure-management platforms. Product capabilities, licensing, integrations, deployment models, pricing, data residency, security authorizations, and product lifecycle status can change. Information labeled Official/Verified is based on official vendor documentation available as of the listed verification date. Information labeled Published Price is a price the vendor currently displays and may not reflect enterprise discounts, minimum commitments, add-ons, taxes, or professional services. Values labeled Estimated are independent planning estimates and are not vendor quotes or service-level commitments. Company-size fit and "Best Product by Scenario" recommendations are labeled EVULNABLE Assessment because they are this tab's own independent judgment, not a vendor claim or endorsement. Organizations should validate current entitlements, licensing, regional availability, compliance authorization, and technical coverage directly with the vendor before purchase.

Independent Comparison Notice: EVULNABLE is an independent informational resource and is not affiliated with, sponsored by, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of the vendors listed on this page unless explicitly stated otherwise. Vendor names and trademarks are used solely to identify the products and services being discussed.

Lifecycle warning — Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM / Kenna Security). Do not shortlist this as a new strategic purchase without a lifecycle review. Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM), Vulnerability Intelligence (formerly Kenna.VI), and the Application Security Module (formerly AppSec) are in their end-of-life cycle.

Historically provided strong risk-based vulnerability aggregation and prioritization under the Kenna Security name before Cisco's acquisition and rebrand.

Official/Verified (per Cisco's End-of-Sale and End-of-Life bulletin, verified against Cisco's own page as part of this tab's fact-check pass): End-of-life announcement — December 10, 2025. End-of-sale date (last day to order) — March 10, 2026. End of service-contract renewal — June 11, 2026. Last date of support — June 30, 2028, after which all subscription and support services become unavailable.

The source research handed off for this tab stated the announcement was "updated May 6, 2026" — that date did not match Cisco's own official EOL bulletin during this tab's fact-check pass, so the dates shown here use Cisco's page directly.

Last verified: August 27, 2026

What was independently fact-checked before publishing

Spot-checked against primary/official sources before publishing: Rapid7 InsightVM's published $1.62/asset/month at 500 assets and Greenbone's OPENVAS BASIC €2,524/year figure both matched the vendor's current page. One correction was made to the source research: Cisco's own End-of-Sale/End-of-Life bulletin lists the EOL announcement date as December 10, 2025 (not May 2026 as the source research stated), with an end-of-sale date of March 10, 2026 and last date of support June 30, 2028 — the figures below use Cisco's official dates. Other pricing and capability figures reflect the handed-off research as sourced from official vendor pages; given how quickly vendor pricing pages change, treat every figure here as provisional and confirm directly with the vendor before relying on it.

Market pricing context

Vendors in this market use very different license metrics, which makes head-to-head pricing comparison difficult: per-asset, per-user/month, per-device/month, flat annual packages, and pure quote-based enterprise deals all appear below. Figures labeled **Published Price** are numbers a vendor currently displays publicly; figures labeled **Estimated** are independent planning/budget guidance only and are not a vendor quote. - Qualys VMDR TruRisk SMB packages start around **$2,195–$4,645**, but enterprise VMDR pricing is primarily quote-based and per asset. - Tenable One VM publishes **$3,500** (1 year) to **$9,975** (3 years) at 100 assets. - Rapid7 InsightVM starts at **$1.62 per asset/month at 500 assets** (roughly **$9,720/year** for 500 assets before discounts/add-ons). - Microsoft Defender VM lists **$3.00 user/month** standalone, or **$2.00 user/month** as an add-on for eligible Defender for Endpoint Plan 2 / Microsoft 365 E5 customers. - ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus publishes Professional and Enterprise on-prem/cloud tiers starting around **$695–$1,545/year** for 100 computers. - Greenbone's OPENVAS BASIC entry-level enterprise product is **€2,524/year**; the underlying Greenbone Community Edition / OpenVAS stack is open source, though running it still has infrastructure and labor costs. - CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management, Wiz, Orca Security, and Ivanti Neurons for RBVM are quote/demo-driven; no reliable public per-asset price should be assumed for these four.

Category definitions
Traditional enterprise vulnerability management
Designed to directly scan large heterogeneous infrastructures using combinations of network scanners, authentication, agents, cloud connectors, asset inventories, risk scoring, reporting, and remediation workflow. Qualys, Tenable, and Rapid7 are the clearest direct competitors to one another.
Endpoint-led exposure / vulnerability management
Vulnerability intelligence is deeply integrated with an endpoint/security agent and broader endpoint telemetry (Microsoft Defender VM, CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management). Can be extremely strong where the endpoint platform is already broadly deployed, but architecture and non-endpoint coverage should be compared carefully against traditional VM.
Cloud-native vulnerability management / CNAPP
Designed primarily around cloud workloads, cloud control-plane context, containers, identities, public exposure, data sensitivity, and attack paths (Wiz, Orca). May complement or partially replace traditional VM in cloud-heavy enterprises but should not automatically be treated as a one-for-one replacement for network-focused VM across legacy on-premises infrastructure.
Risk aggregation / prioritization / orchestration
Aggregates findings from multiple scanners and security tools, normalizes them, applies risk intelligence, and drives remediation (Ivanti Neurons RBVM). Usually sits above or alongside existing scanners rather than replacing them.
Endpoint vulnerability + patch management
Combines vulnerability identification with built-in remediation and endpoint patching (ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus).
Scanner-centric / self-hosted open source
Focuses on active vulnerability testing and scanning with self-hosted/open-source options (Greenbone / OpenVAS).

Request a correction — See outdated information? Product capabilities, pricing, certifications, and lifecycle status can change. If you represent a vendor or notice information that may be outdated, use the link below to request a review or correction.

Export comparison

Pick the platforms to include, then download a self-contained PDF or Excel comparison. Each carries its own Methodology section, a Sources & Verification section with links, and the disclaimer, so the file stands on its own for procurement, management or legal review.

Platforms to include

Platform profile

Cells in the table above are trimmed to five lines; each platform's full text is in the profile below, which the table's platform names link to. One profile at a time. Every profile is its own URL, so a link to one is a link you can send.

Ivanti Neurons for Risk-Based Vulnerability Management

Risk aggregation / prioritization / orchestration

Ingests findings from 100+ sources (scanners, AppSec tools, pen tests, business data) into one prioritized remediation view.

  • Not itemizedGov / FedRAMP
  • No / integrationBuilt-in patch
  • NoOpen source
  • SaaSDeployment
Classification
Risk-based vulnerability aggregation, normalization, prioritization, and remediation orchestration — must not be mislabeled as simply another network vulnerability scanner.
Discovery / scanning
Official/Verified: Does not scan directly — it continuously correlates infrastructure information, vulnerability data, threat intelligence, manual pen-test findings, research findings, and business asset criticality from other systems.
Agent model
N/A — aggregation layer, not a scanning agent. Ingests via connectors from source systems (e.g. Qualys VM/VMDR, Tenable, Rapid7 InsightVM/Nexpose, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon Spotlight, Orca, Wiz, Veracode, Checkmarx, Snyk, Fortify, ServiceNow, and others — 100+ sources per vendor claims).
Asset inventory
Not itemized in source research.
Risk prioritization
Official/Verified: Vulnerability Risk Rating (VRR) and Ivanti RS3 organizational risk scoring, plus playbooks, SLA automation, automated due dates, notifications, threat views, custom dashboards, role-based access, and workflow automation.
Remediation
Official/Verified: Sends prioritized vulnerabilities via API into Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management.
ITSM / ticketing integration
Not itemized in source research. Ivanti markets connectors/workflow automation broadly; confirm exact ServiceNow/Jira depth directly.
Cloud / container / OT coverage
EVULNABLE Assessment: Coverage depends entirely on which source systems are connected — Ivanti itself does not natively scan cloud, containers, or OT.
Data residency
Not itemized in source research.
Pricing
Quote-based. Estimated: budget as an enterprise risk-management/orchestration layer; final cost depends heavily on asset volume, modules, and bundled Ivanti products.No published list price available.
Time to initial data
Estimated: Days, after first connector ingestion.
Typical production rollout
Estimated: 2–8+ weeks — quality depends on connector setup, normalization, business context, and workflow design.
Best-fit company size
EVULNABLE Assessment: Large and very large enterprise, especially organizations with multiple vulnerability scanners, AppSec scanners, pen-test findings, cloud-security tools, multiple business units, and a need for one normalized enterprise risk view.
Potential limitations / evaluation considerations
EVULNABLE Assessment: Value depends heavily on the quality/breadth of connected source systems; not a substitute for an underlying scanner.

Last verified: August 27, 2026

Capability matrix

Strong = central product strength. Yes = supported. Partial = available but not a defining equivalent. Integration = primarily handled through an external system. No / Not primary = not a core capability. * = requires a separately licensed add-on module.

Capability comparison across the platforms matching the current filters
CapabilityQualys VMDRTenable One Vulnerability ManagementRapid7 InsightVM / Exposure CommandMicrosoft Defender Vulnerability ManagementCrowdStrike Falcon Exposure ManagementWiz Unified Vulnerability ManagementOrca Security Cloud Vulnerability ManagementIvanti Neurons for Risk-Based Vulnerability ManagementManageEngine Vulnerability Manager PlusGreenbone / OpenVAS
Enterprise network scanningStrongStrongStrongPartialYes / expanding (NVA)PartialNo / not primaryIntegrationYesStrong
Endpoint agentStrongStrongStrongStrongStrongOptional / agentless-firstOptional / agentless-firstSource-dependentStrongNo / not primary
Cloud-native agentless VMCloud capabilitiesCloud capabilitiesExposure/cloud modulesDefender for CloudCloud securityStrongStrongAggregatesLimitedNo
ContainersYesYes / related productsYes / broader platformDefender for CloudCloud securityStrongStrongAggregatesLimitedScan-dependent
OT/IoTYes / VMDR OTTenable OT ecosystemLimited / other platformLimitedYes / exposure visibilityVaries by cloud/IoT contextCloud-orientedAggregatesNetwork-device focusScan-dependent
External Attack Surface Mgmt (EASM)Qualys CSAM/EASMTenable One ASMSurface CommandSeparate Microsoft EASMYesWiz ASMCloud attack surfaceConnectorsLimitedNo
CISA KEV contextYesYesYesYes (via threat context)Yes / adversary intelEmerging-threat contextEmerging-CVE contextThreat engineYes / attack contextFeed-dependent
EPSSAvailable in Qualys context/productsAvailable in broader dataMay be used in analysisNot a central public scoring termNot a central public scoring termContextualContextualSource-dependentYes, explicitlyFeed-dependent
Built-in patch deploymentYes*Yes, with Tenable Patch Management add-onIntegration/workflowsIntune ecosystemBroader remediation/patch ecosystemGuidance/workflowsGuidance/workflowsIvanti Patch integrationYes, Enterprise editionNo
ServiceNowYesYes / integrationsYesMicrosoft/ITSM ecosystemIntegrationsWorkflows/integrationsYesYesIntegrationsExternal
JiraYesIntegrationsYesExternal/integrationIntegrationsWorkflowsYesConnectors/workflowsIntegrationsExternal
On-prem management optionPrivate Platform optionsYes, Security CenterYes, Security ConsoleNo classic VM serverNo classic VM serverNo classic applianceNo classic applianceSubscription-dependentYesStrong
Open sourceNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoYes
Public transparent pricingLimited (SMB package)YesYesYesQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteYesYes (BASIC)

Deployment / time-to-value

Estimated figures, not vendor SLAs.

Estimated time to initial data and to a production rollout
PlatformTime to Initial Useful DataTypical Production Rollout Estimate
Qualys VMDREstimated: Hours to days for initial data once agents/scanners are configured (based on Qualys's documented agent/scanner setup steps).Estimated: 2–8 weeks typical production rollout — large enterprises need agent rollout, scanner placement, auth records, tags, and integrations.
Tenable One Vulnerability ManagementEstimated: Hours to days.Estimated: 2–6 weeks — scanner/agent architecture and credentials drive the timeline.
Rapid7 InsightVM / Exposure CommandEstimated: Hours to days.Estimated: 2–8 weeks — Security Console, distributed engines, agents, and remediation integrations add setup effort.
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability ManagementEstimated: Potentially hours if Defender is already deployed.Estimated: Days to 4 weeks — fast for existing Defender for Endpoint customers; longer for new endpoint onboarding.
CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure ManagementEstimated: Potentially hours if the Falcon sensor is already deployed.Estimated: Days to 4 weeks — existing Falcon customers can realize value quickly; NVA/cloud/ASM expansion adds scope.
Wiz Unified Vulnerability ManagementEstimated: Often minutes/hours for a first cloud inventory after connecting a cloud account.Estimated: Days to 4 weeks — the agentless architecture speeds cloud onboarding; workflow integration takes longer.
Orca Security Cloud Vulnerability ManagementEstimated: Often minutes/hours after connecting a cloud account.Estimated: Days to 4 weeks — agentless SideScanning simplifies initial cloud deployment.
Ivanti Neurons for Risk-Based Vulnerability ManagementEstimated: Days, after first connector ingestion.Estimated: 2–8+ weeks — quality depends on connector setup, normalization, business context, and workflow design.
ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager PlusEstimated: Hours to days.Estimated: Days to 3 weeks — agent rollout and patch policies are the main effort.
Greenbone / OpenVASEstimated: Hours to days.Estimated: Days to 3 weeks — simple scanner setup can be quick, but tuning/scaling/credentials require expertise.

Selection guidance

How EVULNABLE Evaluates Platforms: Rankings and recommendations below (including "Best Product by Scenario" and "Overall Recommendations") are independent assessments based on documented product capabilities, deployment options, discovery/scanning architecture, remediation functionality, workflow integration, data residency, pricing transparency, and intended organizational fit. They do not represent vendor endorsements, paid placement, or guaranteed suitability for every organization.

Best platform by scenario

Closest overall competitors to Qualys VMDR

  • Tenable One Vulnerability Management
  • Rapid7 InsightVM / Exposure Command
  • CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management (especially where Falcon is already deployed)
  • Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management (especially in Microsoft-standardized estates)

Best traditional hybrid enterprise VM

  • Qualys VMDR
  • Tenable One Vulnerability Management
  • Rapid7 InsightVM

Best for very large cloud-native environments

  • Wiz
  • Orca Security
  • Qualys with cloud modules
  • CrowdStrike Cloud/Exposure ecosystem
  • Microsoft Defender for Cloud + DVM, depending on architecture

Best if already heavily invested in Microsoft

  • Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management — reuses the existing Defender sensor, Intune remediation workflow, Microsoft 365 integration, Defender for Cloud integration, and can carry lower incremental licensing in some Microsoft contracts.

Best if already heavily invested in CrowdStrike

  • CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management — reuses the Falcon single-agent footprint, adds adversary intelligence, ExPRT.AI prioritization, EASM, CAASM, NVA, and CTEM architecture.

Best vulnerability-data aggregation / prioritization layer

  • Ivanti Neurons for RBVM — especially where the organization has multiple scanners and AppSec/cloud tools to normalize into one view.

Best lower-cost commercial VM + integrated patching

  • ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus

Best open-source / self-hosted scanner

  • Greenbone / OpenVAS

Best for on-premises data-control requirements

  • Tenable Security Center
  • Greenbone / OpenVAS
  • ManageEngine on-premises
  • Qualys Private Platform where commercially/architecturally applicable
  • Rapid7 Security Console architecture
Overall recommendations

If the problem is primarily cloud vulnerability risk

  • Wiz
  • Orca Security
  • CrowdStrike Cloud/Exposure ecosystem
  • Microsoft Defender for Cloud + DVM
  • Qualys cloud capabilities

If the problem is prioritizing data from many scanners

  • Ivanti Neurons for RBVM
  • Also evaluate the broader exposure-management aggregation capabilities of Wiz, CrowdStrike, Tenable One, and Rapid7 Exposure Command depending on architecture.

If patching is a major selection factor

  • Qualys VMDR + Patch Management
  • Tenable One VM + Tenable Patch Management
  • ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus Enterprise
  • Microsoft DVM + Intune/Microsoft patch ecosystem
  • Ivanti RBVM + Ivanti Neurons Patch Management

If budget/open source is the priority

  • Greenbone / OpenVAS
  • ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus
Key strategic takeaway

The modern vulnerability-management market is splitting into several layers. **Traditional VM.** Qualys, Tenable, and Rapid7 remain the clearest direct infrastructure vulnerability-management competitors to one another. **Security-platform VM.** Microsoft and CrowdStrike increasingly provide vulnerability/exposure capabilities through endpoint platforms that may eliminate a separate VM agent and correlate vulnerability information with EDR/XDR data. **Cloud-native VM.** Wiz and Orca provide cloud context, identity relationships, data sensitivity, attack paths, and agentless workload analysis that traditional network scanners were not originally designed to provide. **Aggregation / RBVM.** Ivanti is strongest when the problem is not "how do I scan?" but "how do I combine Qualys, Tenable, Rapid7, AppSec, cloud, pen-test, and business data into one remediation priority?" **VM + patch consolidation.** Qualys, Tenable, and ManageEngine now all have significant patch/remediation capabilities, which means modern RFPs should compare vulnerability **closure**, not just vulnerability detection.

Suggested enterprise RFP questions (72 items)

Asset coverage

  • Which operating systems are fully supported?
  • Are network devices supported?
  • Which hypervisors are supported?
  • How are unmanaged devices discovered?
  • Is passive discovery available?
  • How are remote endpoints assessed?
  • How are IoT and OT assets handled?
  • Are mobile devices covered?
  • Are containers/Kubernetes covered?
  • Are serverless workloads covered?
  • Does the platform discover external attack surface/shadow IT?

Scanner architecture

  • Is scanning agent-based, network-based, agentless, or hybrid?
  • How many scanner appliances are required?
  • How are scanner updates handled?
  • Can scanners operate in disconnected/restricted networks?
  • Is an air-gapped deployment supported?
  • Can scans originate from specific geographic regions?
  • Are authenticated scans supported?
  • Which credential vaults are supported?
  • How does the platform avoid duplicate assets between agents/scanners/cloud connectors?

Prioritization

  • Does scoring incorporate CISA KEV?
  • Does it incorporate EPSS?
  • Does it incorporate exploit availability?
  • Does it incorporate active exploitation?
  • Does it incorporate ransomware association?
  • Is asset criticality included?
  • Is internet exposure included?
  • Is attack-path context included?
  • Is identity/privilege context included?
  • Is sensitive-data context included?
  • Can the organization customize prioritization?

Remediation

  • Does the platform deploy patches itself?
  • Is patch management an add-on?
  • Which OSs are supported for patch deployment?
  • Which third-party applications are supported?
  • Can patches be rolled back?
  • Are maintenance windows supported?
  • Can test/pilot groups be configured?
  • Is supersedence handled automatically?
  • Can non-patch mitigations/scripts be deployed?

Workflow

  • Is ServiceNow natively supported?
  • Is Jira supported?
  • Are tickets bidirectional?
  • Can tickets auto-close after a clean rescan?
  • Is there an API?
  • Are webhooks supported?
  • Is bulk export available?
  • Can business ownership/CMDB data be imported?
  • Can remediation SLAs be defined?
  • Is exception/risk-acceptance workflow included?

Reporting

  • Can the tool report by business unit, geography, OS, asset criticality, internet exposure, CISA KEV, vulnerability age, risk score, CVSS, and EPSS/EOL software?
  • Can executive reports show risk reduction over time?
  • Can historical findings be retained after remediation?
  • Can compliance evidence be generated?

Global / sovereignty

  • Where is customer data hosted?
  • Can region be selected?
  • Are US, EU, UK, Canada, Australia, India, UAE, and Saudi-region options available?
  • Is a government/FedRAMP environment available?
  • Can the platform support strict national data residency?
  • Does support staff access cross borders?
  • What subprocessors have access?
  • Can scanner traffic stay entirely local?

Licensing

  • Is licensing based on assets, IP addresses, users, workloads, cloud resources, agents, FQDNs, or data ingestion?
  • How are ephemeral cloud assets counted?
  • How are duplicate assets counted?
  • Are scanners included?
  • Are agents included?
  • Is patch management included?
  • Is EASM included?
  • Are API calls limited?
  • Is premium support extra?
  • Is professional services/onboarding required?

About this comparison

Research date: August 27, 2026. See the disclaimer at the top of this page for sourcing and accuracy caveats. EVULNABLE has no commercial relationship with any platform listed here.