CVE Lookup
Find one CVE by ID, or search NVD by product, version or words from the description.
1 result for CVE-2025-61809 · exact CVE match · NVD record, scored with CISA KEV and FIRST EPSS
CVE-2025-61809
ColdFusion versions 2025.4, 2023.16, 2021.22 and earlier are affected by an Improper Input Validation vulnerability that could result in a Security feature…
CWE-20 — Improper input validation
EVRS 14 of 100 Elevated
Scheduled Maintenance
Why it scores 14
Evidence available: 3 of 7 signalsAn EPSS probability of 0.007, and CVSS base score 9.1.
- CISA KEVDid not apply
- RansomwareNo data
- Vendor exploitationNo data
- EPSSApplied
- Microsoft Exploitability IndexNot applicable
- Pre-patch disclosureNo data
- KEV recencyNo data
- CVSSApplied
The band answers “how soon”, not “how bad”. No data for: Ransomware, Vendor exploitation, Pre-patch disclosure, KEV recency. Why some signals show no data
Fix
No fixed version identified yetAffected versions
- coldfusion
202120232025
Remediation
Apply the vendor patch or guidance: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-5mvc-x488-xrpc
Evidence
Each value with its source| Measure | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS base scoreHow severe the flaw is in itself. It does not say how likely an attack is. | 9.1 | NVD |
| FIRST EPSSFIRST's estimate of the chance this is exploited in the next 30 days, and how that ranks against all CVEs. | 0.007 (51.1st pctl) | FIRST EPSS |
| Actively exploitedWhether a source of record has confirmed attacks using it in the wild. | Not confirmed | CISA KEV |
| Public exploit moduleA module existing is not the same as active exploitation. | None known | Metasploit |
| EUVD cross-referenceENISA's record: CVSS 9.1 (v3.1), assigned by adobe. | Listed | ENISA EUVD |
Description
NVDColdFusion versions 2025.4, 2023.16, 2021.22 and earlier are affected by an Improper Input Validation vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read and write access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction and scope is unchanged.
