Vulnerability Management Tool Comparison

Vulnerability Management Vendor Disclaimer: EVULNABLE provides independent informational comparisons of vulnerability-management and exposure-management platforms. Product capabilities, licensing, integrations, deployment models, pricing, data residency, security authorizations, and product lifecycle status can change. Information labeled Official/Verified is based on official vendor documentation available as of the listed verification date. Information labeled Published Price is a price the vendor currently displays and may not reflect enterprise discounts, minimum commitments, add-ons, taxes, or professional services. Values labeled Estimated are independent planning estimates and are not vendor quotes or service-level commitments. Company-size fit and "Best Product by Scenario" recommendations are labeled EVULNABLE Assessment because they are this tab's own independent judgment, not a vendor claim or endorsement. Organizations should validate current entitlements, licensing, regional availability, compliance authorization, and technical coverage directly with the vendor before purchase.

Historically provided strong risk-based vulnerability aggregation and prioritization under the Kenna Security name before Cisco's acquisition and rebrand.

Official/Verified (per Cisco's End-of-Sale and End-of-Life bulletin, verified against Cisco's own page as part of this tab's fact-check pass): End-of-life announcement — December 10, 2025. End-of-sale date (last day to order) — March 10, 2026. End of service-contract renewal — June 11, 2026. Last date of support — June 30, 2028, after which all subscription and support services become unavailable.

The source research handed off for this tab stated the announcement was "updated May 6, 2026" — that date did not match Cisco's own official EOL bulletin during this tab's fact-check pass, so the dates shown here use Cisco's page directly.

Last verified: August 27, 2026

Spot-checked against primary/official sources before publishing: Rapid7 InsightVM's published $1.62/asset/month at 500 assets and Greenbone's OPENVAS BASIC €2,524/year figure both matched the vendor's current page. One correction was made to the source research: Cisco's own End-of-Sale/End-of-Life bulletin lists the EOL announcement date as December 10, 2025 (not May 2026 as the source research stated), with an end-of-sale date of March 10, 2026 and last date of support June 30, 2028 — the figures below use Cisco's official dates. Other pricing and capability figures reflect the handed-off research as sourced from official vendor pages; given how quickly vendor pricing pages change, treat every figure here as provisional and confirm directly with the vendor before relying on it.

Vendors in this market use very different license metrics, which makes head-to-head pricing comparison difficult: per-asset, per-user/month, per-device/month, flat annual packages, and pure quote-based enterprise deals all appear below. Figures labeled **Published Price** are numbers a vendor currently displays publicly; figures labeled **Estimated** are independent planning/budget guidance only and are not a vendor quote. - Qualys VMDR TruRisk SMB packages start around **$2,195–$4,645**, but enterprise VMDR pricing is primarily quote-based and per asset. - Tenable One VM publishes **$3,500** (1 year) to **$9,975** (3 years) at 100 assets. - Rapid7 InsightVM starts at **$1.62 per asset/month at 500 assets** (roughly **$9,720/year** for 500 assets before discounts/add-ons). - Microsoft Defender VM lists **$3.00 user/month** standalone, or **$2.00 user/month** as an add-on for eligible Defender for Endpoint Plan 2 / Microsoft 365 E5 customers. - ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus publishes Professional and Enterprise on-prem/cloud tiers starting around **$695–$1,545/year** for 100 computers. - Greenbone's OPENVAS BASIC entry-level enterprise product is **€2,524/year**; the underlying Greenbone Community Edition / OpenVAS stack is open source, though running it still has infrastructure and labor costs. - CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management, Wiz, Orca Security, and Ivanti Neurons for RBVM are quote/demo-driven; no reliable public per-asset price should be assumed for these four.

Traditional enterprise vulnerability management

Designed to directly scan large heterogeneous infrastructures using combinations of network scanners, authentication, agents, cloud connectors, asset inventories, risk scoring, reporting, and remediation workflow. Qualys, Tenable, and Rapid7 are the clearest direct competitors to one another.

Endpoint-led exposure / vulnerability management

Vulnerability intelligence is deeply integrated with an endpoint/security agent and broader endpoint telemetry (Microsoft Defender VM, CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management). Can be extremely strong where the endpoint platform is already broadly deployed, but architecture and non-endpoint coverage should be compared carefully against traditional VM.

Cloud-native vulnerability management / CNAPP

Designed primarily around cloud workloads, cloud control-plane context, containers, identities, public exposure, data sensitivity, and attack paths (Wiz, Orca). May complement or partially replace traditional VM in cloud-heavy enterprises but should not automatically be treated as a one-for-one replacement for network-focused VM across legacy on-premises infrastructure.

Risk aggregation / prioritization / orchestration

Aggregates findings from multiple scanners and security tools, normalizes them, applies risk intelligence, and drives remediation (Ivanti Neurons RBVM). Usually sits above or alongside existing scanners rather than replacing them.

Endpoint vulnerability + patch management

Combines vulnerability identification with built-in remediation and endpoint patching (ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus).

Scanner-centric / self-hosted open source

Focuses on active vulnerability testing and scanning with self-hosted/open-source options (Greenbone / OpenVAS).

Closest overall competitors to Qualys VMDR

• Tenable One Vulnerability Management
• Rapid7 InsightVM / Exposure Command
• CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management (especially where Falcon is already deployed)
• Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management (especially in Microsoft-standardized estates)

Best traditional hybrid enterprise VM

• Qualys VMDR
• Tenable One Vulnerability Management
• Rapid7 InsightVM

Best for very large cloud-native environments

• Wiz
• Orca Security
• Qualys with cloud modules
• CrowdStrike Cloud/Exposure ecosystem
• Microsoft Defender for Cloud + DVM, depending on architecture

Best if already heavily invested in Microsoft

• Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management — reuses the existing Defender sensor, Intune remediation workflow, Microsoft 365 integration, Defender for Cloud integration, and can carry lower incremental licensing in some Microsoft contracts.

Best if already heavily invested in CrowdStrike

• CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management — reuses the Falcon single-agent footprint, adds adversary intelligence, ExPRT.AI prioritization, EASM, CAASM, NVA, and CTEM architecture.

Best vulnerability-data aggregation / prioritization layer

• Ivanti Neurons for RBVM — especially where the organization has multiple scanners and AppSec/cloud tools to normalize into one view.

Best lower-cost commercial VM + integrated patching

• ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus

Best open-source / self-hosted scanner

• Greenbone / OpenVAS

Best for on-premises data-control requirements

• Tenable Security Center
• Greenbone / OpenVAS
• ManageEngine on-premises
• Qualys Private Platform where commercially/architecturally applicable
• Rapid7 Security Console architecture

If the problem is primarily cloud vulnerability risk

• Wiz
• Orca Security
• CrowdStrike Cloud/Exposure ecosystem
• Microsoft Defender for Cloud + DVM
• Qualys cloud capabilities

If the problem is prioritizing data from many scanners

• Ivanti Neurons for RBVM
• Also evaluate the broader exposure-management aggregation capabilities of Wiz, CrowdStrike, Tenable One, and Rapid7 Exposure Command depending on architecture.

If patching is a major selection factor

• Qualys VMDR + Patch Management
• Tenable One VM + Tenable Patch Management
• ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus Enterprise
• Microsoft DVM + Intune/Microsoft patch ecosystem
• Ivanti RBVM + Ivanti Neurons Patch Management

If budget/open source is the priority

• Greenbone / OpenVAS
• ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus

The modern vulnerability-management market is splitting into several layers. **Traditional VM.** Qualys, Tenable, and Rapid7 remain the clearest direct infrastructure vulnerability-management competitors to one another. **Security-platform VM.** Microsoft and CrowdStrike increasingly provide vulnerability/exposure capabilities through endpoint platforms that may eliminate a separate VM agent and correlate vulnerability information with EDR/XDR data. **Cloud-native VM.** Wiz and Orca provide cloud context, identity relationships, data sensitivity, attack paths, and agentless workload analysis that traditional network scanners were not originally designed to provide. **Aggregation / RBVM.** Ivanti is strongest when the problem is not "how do I scan?" but "how do I combine Qualys, Tenable, Rapid7, AppSec, cloud, pen-test, and business data into one remediation priority?" **VM + patch consolidation.** Qualys, Tenable, and ManageEngine now all have significant patch/remediation capabilities, which means modern RFPs should compare vulnerability **closure**, not just vulnerability detection.