Compare vulnerability management tools
10 platforms side by side: capabilities, deployment, discovery, published or estimated pricing, and 72 RFP questions.
Overview
10 of 10 platformsTick up to 4 to compare side by side
Qualys VMDRTraditional enterprise VM | SaaS, Private platform (limited on-prem-style option) | Agent, Network scanner, Passive discovery, Agentless cloud | Yes* | Yes | Mid-market through very large global enterprise |
Tenable One Vulnerability ManagementTraditional enterprise VM | SaaS, On-premises (Security Center) | Agent, Network scanner, Agentless cloud | Yes | Yes | Mid-market through very large enterprise |
Rapid7 InsightVM / Exposure CommandTraditional enterprise VM | SaaS, On-premises (Security Console/engines) | Agent, Network scanner, Agentless cloud | No / integration | Not itemized | Mid-market through large enterprise |
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability ManagementEndpoint-led exposure / vulnerability management | SaaS | Agent, Agentless cloud | No / integration | Not itemized | SMB through very large enterprise |
CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure ManagementEndpoint-led exposure / vulnerability management | SaaS | Agent, Network scanner, Agentless cloud | No / integration | Yes | Mid-market through very large enterprise |
Wiz Unified Vulnerability ManagementCloud-native VM / CNAPP | SaaS | Agentless cloud, Optional sensor | No / integration | Not itemized | Mid-market through very large enterprise with significant cloud infrastructure |
Orca Security Cloud Vulnerability ManagementCloud-native VM / CNAPP | SaaS | Agentless cloud, Optional sensor | No / integration | Yes | Mid-market through global enterprise with meaningful cloud workloads |
Ivanti Neurons for Risk-Based Vulnerability ManagementRisk aggregation / prioritization / orchestration | SaaS | Aggregates other sources (no native scanner) | No / integration | Not itemized | Large and very large enterprise, especially organizations with multiple vulnerability scanners, AppSec scanners, pen-test findings, cloud-security tools, multiple business units, and a need for one normalized enterprise risk view |
ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager PlusEndpoint VM + patch management | SaaS, On-premises | Agent, Network scanner | Yes | Not itemized | SMB through mid-market; potentially larger cost-conscious enterprises with endpoint-focused requirements |
Greenbone / OpenVASScanner-centric / self-hosted open source | On-premises, Self-hosted / air-gapped | Network scanner | No / integration | Not itemized | Small and mid-size organizations, labs, security researchers, privacy-conscious environments, organizations with Linux/security-engineering expertise, and teams needing a lower-cost self-hosted scanner |
* Qualys patch deployment needs the separately licensed Qualys Patch Management module. VMDR alone identifies missing patches but does not deploy them. Best fit is an EVULNABLE Assessment; the full text is in each profile.
Pricing
Published Estimated Quote onlyPublished means the vendor shows the price. Estimated means this research's planning figure, not a vendor quote.
| Platform | Basis | Published or estimated figure |
|---|---|---|
Qualys VMDR | PublishedPublished Price (SMB packages) + quote-based enterprise | VMDR TruRisk from $2,195; TruRisk FixIT from $2,995; TruRisk ProtectIT from $4,645 (SMB packages). Enterprise VMDR pricing is quote-based and per asset. |
Tenable One Vulnerability Management | PublishedPublished Price | 100 assets — 1 year $3,500, 2 years $6,825, 3 years $9,975. |
Rapid7 InsightVM / Exposure Command | PublishedPublished Price | starts at $1.62/asset/month at 500 assets (~$9,720/year for 500 assets before add-ons, services, taxes, or discounts). |
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management | PublishedPublished Price | Standalone $3.00/user/month (annual commitment); add-on $2.00/user/month (annual commitment) for eligible Defender for Endpoint Plan 2 / Microsoft 365 E5 customers. |
CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management | EstimatedEstimated (quote-driven) | quote/demo-driven; budget as a five-figure-or-larger annual enterprise purchase depending on endpoint count/modules. Do not treat any specific number as official. |
Wiz Unified Vulnerability Management | Quote onlyQuote-based (modular) | Wiz's pricing page states licensing is modular and scales on metrics such as workloads, developers, log ingestion, or sensors depending on product. No simple public per-asset VM price should be assumed. |
Orca Security Cloud Vulnerability Management | Quote onlyQuote-based | Commercial pricing is quote/demo-driven. Do not assume or invent a public list price. |
Ivanti Neurons for Risk-Based Vulnerability Management | Quote onlyQuote-based | Quote-based. Estimated: budget as an enterprise risk-management/orchestration layer; final cost depends heavily on asset volume, modules, and bundled Ivanti products. |
ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus | PublishedPublished Price | Published Price (100 computers/1 technician): Professional — on-prem annual $695, cloud annual $895. Enterprise — on-prem annual $1,195, cloud annual $1,545. Product page also lists Professional from ~$0.90/device/month and Enterprise from ~$1.55/device/month. |
Greenbone / OpenVAS | PublishedPublished Price + open source | OPENVAS BASIC (entry-level enterprise product) — €2,524/year. The underlying Greenbone Community Edition / OpenVAS stack is open source and free to run, though operating it still incurs infrastructure and labor costs. |
Capabilities
14 capabilities in 4 groupsStrong = central product strength. Yes = supported. Partial = available but not a defining equivalent. Integration = primarily handled through an external product or connector. Not itemized = the research did not state it.
| Platform | Enterprise network scanning | Endpoint agent | Cloud-native agentless VM | Containers | OT/IoT | External attack surface (EASM) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Qualys VMDR | Strong | Strong | Cloud capabilities | Yes | Yes / VMDR OT | Qualys CSAM/EASM |
Tenable One Vulnerability Management | Strong | Strong | Cloud capabilities | Yes / related products | Tenable OT ecosystem | Tenable One ASM |
Rapid7 InsightVM / Exposure Command | Strong | Strong | Exposure/cloud modules | Yes / broader platform | Limited / other platform | Surface Command |
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management | Partial | Strong | Defender for Cloud | Defender for Cloud | Limited | Separate Microsoft EASM |
CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management | Yes / expanding (NVA) | Strong | Cloud security | Cloud security | Yes / exposure visibility | Yes |
Wiz Unified Vulnerability Management | Partial | Optional / agentless-first | Strong | Strong | Varies by cloud/IoT context | Wiz ASM |
Orca Security Cloud Vulnerability Management | No / not primary | Optional / agentless-first | Strong | Strong | Cloud-oriented | Cloud attack surface |
Ivanti Neurons for Risk-Based Vulnerability Management | Integration | Source-dependent | Aggregates | Aggregates | Aggregates | Connectors |
ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus | Yes | Strong | Limited | Limited | Network-device focus | Limited |
Greenbone / OpenVAS | Strong | No / not primary | No | Scan-dependent | Scan-dependent | No |
| Platform | CISA KEV context | EPSS |
|---|---|---|
Qualys VMDR | Yes | Available in Qualys context/products |
Tenable One Vulnerability Management | Yes | Available in broader data |
Rapid7 InsightVM / Exposure Command | Yes | May be used in analysis |
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management | Yes (via threat context) | Not a central public scoring term |
CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management | Yes / adversary intel | Not a central public scoring term |
Wiz Unified Vulnerability Management | Emerging-threat context | Contextual |
Orca Security Cloud Vulnerability Management | Emerging-CVE context | Contextual |
Ivanti Neurons for Risk-Based Vulnerability Management | Threat engine | Source-dependent |
ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus | Yes / attack context | Yes, explicitly |
Greenbone / OpenVAS | Feed-dependent | Feed-dependent |
| Platform | Built-in patch deployment | ServiceNow | Jira |
|---|---|---|---|
Qualys VMDR | Yes* | Yes | Yes |
Tenable One Vulnerability Management | Yes, with Tenable Patch Management add-on | Yes / integrations | Integrations |
Rapid7 InsightVM / Exposure Command | Integration/workflows | Yes | Yes |
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management | Intune ecosystem | Microsoft/ITSM ecosystem | External/integration |
CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management | Broader remediation/patch ecosystem | Integrations | Integrations |
Wiz Unified Vulnerability Management | Guidance/workflows | Workflows/integrations | Workflows |
Orca Security Cloud Vulnerability Management | Guidance/workflows | Yes | Yes |
Ivanti Neurons for Risk-Based Vulnerability Management | Ivanti Patch integration | Yes | Connectors/workflows |
ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus | Yes, Enterprise edition | Integrations | Integrations |
Greenbone / OpenVAS | No | External | External |
| Platform | On-prem management option | Open source | Public transparent pricing |
|---|---|---|---|
Qualys VMDR | Private Platform options | No | Limited (SMB package) |
Tenable One Vulnerability Management | Yes, Security Center | No | Yes |
Rapid7 InsightVM / Exposure Command | Yes, Security Console | No | Yes |
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management | No classic VM server | No | Yes |
CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management | No classic VM server | No | Quote |
Wiz Unified Vulnerability Management | No classic appliance | No | Quote |
Orca Security Cloud Vulnerability Management | No classic appliance | No | Quote |
Ivanti Neurons for Risk-Based Vulnerability Management | Subscription-dependent | No | Quote |
ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus | Yes | No | Yes |
Greenbone / OpenVAS | Strong | Yes | Yes (BASIC) |
Time to value
Estimated All values are estimates, not vendor SLAs| Platform | Time to initial useful data | Typical production rollout |
|---|---|---|
Qualys VMDR | Hours to days for initial data once agents/scanners are configured (based on Qualys's documented agent/scanner setup steps). | 2–8 weeks typical production rollout — large enterprises need agent rollout, scanner placement, auth records, tags, and integrations. |
Tenable One Vulnerability Management | Hours to days. | 2–6 weeks — scanner/agent architecture and credentials drive the timeline. |
Rapid7 InsightVM / Exposure Command | Hours to days. | 2–8 weeks — Security Console, distributed engines, agents, and remediation integrations add setup effort. |
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management | Potentially hours if Defender is already deployed. | Days to 4 weeks — fast for existing Defender for Endpoint customers; longer for new endpoint onboarding. |
CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management | Potentially hours if the Falcon sensor is already deployed. | Days to 4 weeks — existing Falcon customers can realize value quickly; NVA/cloud/ASM expansion adds scope. |
Wiz Unified Vulnerability Management | Often minutes/hours for a first cloud inventory after connecting a cloud account. | Days to 4 weeks — the agentless architecture speeds cloud onboarding; workflow integration takes longer. |
Orca Security Cloud Vulnerability Management | Often minutes/hours after connecting a cloud account. | Days to 4 weeks — agentless SideScanning simplifies initial cloud deployment. |
Ivanti Neurons for Risk-Based Vulnerability Management | Days, after first connector ingestion. | 2–8+ weeks — quality depends on connector setup, normalization, business context, and workflow design. |
ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus | Hours to days. | Days to 3 weeks — agent rollout and patch policies are the main effort. |
Greenbone / OpenVAS | Hours to days. | Days to 3 weeks — simple scanner setup can be quick, but tuning/scaling/credentials require expertise. |
Starting points
EVULNABLE AssessmentHow EVULNABLE Evaluates Platforms: Rankings and recommendations below (including "Best Product by Scenario" and "Overall Recommendations") are independent assessments based on documented product capabilities, deployment options, discovery/scanning architecture, remediation functionality, workflow integration, data residency, pricing transparency, and intended organizational fit. They do not represent vendor endorsements, paid placement, or guaranteed suitability for every organization.
Best platform by scenario
Closest overall competitors to Qualys VMDR
- Tenable One Vulnerability Management
- Rapid7 InsightVM / Exposure Command
- CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management (especially where Falcon is already deployed)
- Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management (especially in Microsoft-standardized estates)
Best traditional hybrid enterprise VM
Best for very large cloud-native environments
- Wiz
- Orca Security
- Qualys with cloud modules
- CrowdStrike Cloud/Exposure ecosystem
- Microsoft Defender for Cloud + DVM, depending on architecture
Best if already heavily invested in Microsoft
- Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management — reuses the existing Defender sensor, Intune remediation workflow, Microsoft 365 integration, Defender for Cloud integration, and can carry lower incremental licensing in some Microsoft contracts.
Best if already heavily invested in CrowdStrike
- CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management — reuses the Falcon single-agent footprint, adds adversary intelligence, ExPRT.AI prioritization, EASM, CAASM, NVA, and CTEM architecture.
Best vulnerability-data aggregation / prioritization layer
- Ivanti Neurons for RBVM — especially where the organization has multiple scanners and AppSec/cloud tools to normalize into one view.
Best lower-cost commercial VM + integrated patching
Best open-source / self-hosted scanner
Best for on-premises data-control requirements
Overall recommendations
If the problem is primarily cloud vulnerability risk
- Wiz
- Orca Security
- CrowdStrike Cloud/Exposure ecosystem
- Microsoft Defender for Cloud + DVM
- Qualys cloud capabilities
If the problem is prioritizing data from many scanners
- Ivanti Neurons for RBVM
- Also evaluate the broader exposure-management aggregation capabilities of Wiz, CrowdStrike, Tenable One, and Rapid7 Exposure Command depending on architecture.
If patching is a major selection factor
- Qualys VMDR + Patch Management
- Tenable One VM + Tenable Patch Management
- ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus Enterprise
- Microsoft DVM + Intune/Microsoft patch ecosystem
- Ivanti RBVM + Ivanti Neurons Patch Management
If budget/open source is the priority
- Greenbone / OpenVAS
- ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus
Key strategic takeaway
The modern vulnerability-management market is splitting into several layers. **Traditional VM.** Qualys, Tenable, and Rapid7 remain the clearest direct infrastructure vulnerability-management competitors to one another. **Security-platform VM.** Microsoft and CrowdStrike increasingly provide vulnerability/exposure capabilities through endpoint platforms that may eliminate a separate VM agent and correlate vulnerability information with EDR/XDR data. **Cloud-native VM.** Wiz and Orca provide cloud context, identity relationships, data sensitivity, attack paths, and agentless workload analysis that traditional network scanners were not originally designed to provide. **Aggregation / RBVM.** Ivanti is strongest when the problem is not "how do I scan?" but "how do I combine Qualys, Tenable, Rapid7, AppSec, cloud, pen-test, and business data into one remediation priority?" **VM + patch consolidation.** Qualys, Tenable, and ManageEngine now all have significant patch/remediation capabilities, which means modern RFPs should compare vulnerability **closure**, not just vulnerability detection.
Lifecycle warning: Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM / Kenna Security). Do not shortlist this as a new strategic purchase without a lifecycle review. Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM), Vulnerability Intelligence (formerly Kenna.VI), and the Application Security Module (formerly AppSec) are in their end-of-life cycle.
Historically provided strong risk-based vulnerability aggregation and prioritization under the Kenna Security name before Cisco's acquisition and rebrand.
Official/Verified (per Cisco's End-of-Sale and End-of-Life bulletin, verified against Cisco's own page as part of this tab's fact-check pass): End-of-life announcement — December 10, 2025. End-of-sale date (last day to order) — March 10, 2026. End of service-contract renewal — June 11, 2026. Last date of support — June 30, 2028, after which all subscription and support services become unavailable.
The source research handed off for this tab stated the announcement was "updated May 6, 2026" — that date did not match Cisco's own official EOL bulletin during this tab's fact-check pass, so the dates shown here use Cisco's page directly.
Last verified: August 27, 2026. Not in the filters or the tables.
Independent Comparison Notice: EVULNABLE is an independent informational resource and is not affiliated with, sponsored by, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of the vendors listed on this page unless explicitly stated otherwise. Vendor names and trademarks are used solely to identify the products and services being discussed.
See outdated information? Product capabilities, pricing, certifications, and lifecycle status can change. If you represent a vendor or notice information that may be outdated, use the link below to request a review or correction.
Important disclaimer
Vulnerability Management Vendor Disclaimer: EVULNABLE provides independent informational comparisons of vulnerability-management and exposure-management platforms. Product capabilities, licensing, integrations, deployment models, pricing, data residency, security authorizations, and product lifecycle status can change. Information labeled Official/Verified is based on official vendor documentation available as of the listed verification date. Information labeled Published Price is a price the vendor currently displays and may not reflect enterprise discounts, minimum commitments, add-ons, taxes, or professional services. Values labeled Estimated are independent planning estimates and are not vendor quotes or service-level commitments. Company-size fit and "Best Product by Scenario" recommendations are labeled EVULNABLE Assessment because they are this tab's own independent judgment, not a vendor claim or endorsement. Organizations should validate current entitlements, licensing, regional availability, compliance authorization, and technical coverage directly with the vendor before purchase.
What was independently fact-checked before publishing
Spot-checked against primary/official sources before publishing: Rapid7 InsightVM's published $1.62/asset/month at 500 assets and Greenbone's OPENVAS BASIC €2,524/year figure both matched the vendor's current page. One correction was made to the source research: Cisco's own End-of-Sale/End-of-Life bulletin lists the EOL announcement date as December 10, 2025 (not May 2026 as the source research stated), with an end-of-sale date of March 10, 2026 and last date of support June 30, 2028 — the figures below use Cisco's official dates. Other pricing and capability figures reflect the handed-off research as sourced from official vendor pages; given how quickly vendor pricing pages change, treat every figure here as provisional and confirm directly with the vendor before relying on it.
Market pricing context
Vendors in this market use very different license metrics, which makes head-to-head pricing comparison difficult: per-asset, per-user/month, per-device/month, flat annual packages, and pure quote-based enterprise deals all appear below. Figures labeled **Published Price** are numbers a vendor currently displays publicly; figures labeled **Estimated** are independent planning/budget guidance only and are not a vendor quote. - Qualys VMDR TruRisk SMB packages start around **$2,195–$4,645**, but enterprise VMDR pricing is primarily quote-based and per asset. - Tenable One VM publishes **$3,500** (1 year) to **$9,975** (3 years) at 100 assets. - Rapid7 InsightVM starts at **$1.62 per asset/month at 500 assets** (roughly **$9,720/year** for 500 assets before discounts/add-ons). - Microsoft Defender VM lists **$3.00 user/month** standalone, or **$2.00 user/month** as an add-on for eligible Defender for Endpoint Plan 2 / Microsoft 365 E5 customers. - ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus publishes Professional and Enterprise on-prem/cloud tiers starting around **$695–$1,545/year** for 100 computers. - Greenbone's OPENVAS BASIC entry-level enterprise product is **€2,524/year**; the underlying Greenbone Community Edition / OpenVAS stack is open source, though running it still has infrastructure and labor costs. - CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management, Wiz, Orca Security, and Ivanti Neurons for RBVM are quote/demo-driven; no reliable public per-asset price should be assumed for these four.
Category definitions
- Traditional enterprise vulnerability management
- Designed to directly scan large heterogeneous infrastructures using combinations of network scanners, authentication, agents, cloud connectors, asset inventories, risk scoring, reporting, and remediation workflow. Qualys, Tenable, and Rapid7 are the clearest direct competitors to one another.
- Endpoint-led exposure / vulnerability management
- Vulnerability intelligence is deeply integrated with an endpoint/security agent and broader endpoint telemetry (Microsoft Defender VM, CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management). Can be extremely strong where the endpoint platform is already broadly deployed, but architecture and non-endpoint coverage should be compared carefully against traditional VM.
- Cloud-native vulnerability management / CNAPP
- Designed primarily around cloud workloads, cloud control-plane context, containers, identities, public exposure, data sensitivity, and attack paths (Wiz, Orca). May complement or partially replace traditional VM in cloud-heavy enterprises but should not automatically be treated as a one-for-one replacement for network-focused VM across legacy on-premises infrastructure.
- Risk aggregation / prioritization / orchestration
- Aggregates findings from multiple scanners and security tools, normalizes them, applies risk intelligence, and drives remediation (Ivanti Neurons RBVM). Usually sits above or alongside existing scanners rather than replacing them.
- Endpoint vulnerability + patch management
- Combines vulnerability identification with built-in remediation and endpoint patching (ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus).
- Scanner-centric / self-hosted open source
- Focuses on active vulnerability testing and scanning with self-hosted/open-source options (Greenbone / OpenVAS).
RFP questions
72 vendor-neutral questions in 8 groupsWritten to paste into a request for proposal. Each question presumes no answer and points at no platform. The PDF and Excel exports include them.
Asset coverage 11
- Which operating systems are fully supported?
- Are network devices supported?
- Which hypervisors are supported?
- How are unmanaged devices discovered?
- Is passive discovery available?
- How are remote endpoints assessed?
- How are IoT and OT assets handled?
- Are mobile devices covered?
- Are containers/Kubernetes covered?
- Are serverless workloads covered?
- Does the platform discover external attack surface/shadow IT?
Scanner architecture 9
- Is scanning agent-based, network-based, agentless, or hybrid?
- How many scanner appliances are required?
- How are scanner updates handled?
- Can scanners operate in disconnected/restricted networks?
- Is an air-gapped deployment supported?
- Can scans originate from specific geographic regions?
- Are authenticated scans supported?
- Which credential vaults are supported?
- How does the platform avoid duplicate assets between agents/scanners/cloud connectors?
Prioritization 11
- Does scoring incorporate CISA KEV?
- Does it incorporate EPSS?
- Does it incorporate exploit availability?
- Does it incorporate active exploitation?
- Does it incorporate ransomware association?
- Is asset criticality included?
- Is internet exposure included?
- Is attack-path context included?
- Is identity/privilege context included?
- Is sensitive-data context included?
- Can the organization customize prioritization?
Remediation 9
- Does the platform deploy patches itself?
- Is patch management an add-on?
- Which OSs are supported for patch deployment?
- Which third-party applications are supported?
- Can patches be rolled back?
- Are maintenance windows supported?
- Can test/pilot groups be configured?
- Is supersedence handled automatically?
- Can non-patch mitigations/scripts be deployed?
Workflow 10
- Is ServiceNow natively supported?
- Is Jira supported?
- Are tickets bidirectional?
- Can tickets auto-close after a clean rescan?
- Is there an API?
- Are webhooks supported?
- Is bulk export available?
- Can business ownership/CMDB data be imported?
- Can remediation SLAs be defined?
- Is exception/risk-acceptance workflow included?
Reporting 4
- Can the tool report by business unit, geography, OS, asset criticality, internet exposure, CISA KEV, vulnerability age, risk score, CVSS, and EPSS/EOL software?
- Can executive reports show risk reduction over time?
- Can historical findings be retained after remediation?
- Can compliance evidence be generated?
Global / sovereignty 8
- Where is customer data hosted?
- Can region be selected?
- Are US, EU, UK, Canada, Australia, India, UAE, and Saudi-region options available?
- Is a government/FedRAMP environment available?
- Can the platform support strict national data residency?
- Does support staff access cross borders?
- What subprocessors have access?
- Can scanner traffic stay entirely local?
Licensing 10
- Is licensing based on assets, IP addresses, users, workloads, cloud resources, agents, FQDNs, or data ingestion?
- How are ephemeral cloud assets counted?
- How are duplicate assets counted?
- Are scanners included?
- Are agents included?
- Is patch management included?
- Is EASM included?
- Are API calls limited?
- Is premium support extra?
- Is professional services/onboarding required?
Export
PDF and Excel files carry their own methodology, sources and disclaimer. They include the platforms you tick, or every platform that matches the filters when none are ticked.
Continuous, endpoint-telemetry-driven vulnerability discovery deeply tied to Defender for Endpoint.
- Gov / FedRAMPNot itemized
- Built-in patchNo / integration
- Open sourceNo
- DeploymentSaaS
- Classification
- Endpoint-led vulnerability management, part of the Microsoft Defender / exposure-management ecosystem.
- Discovery / scanning
- Official/VerifiedContinuous discovery via devices onboarded to Defender for Endpoint — device inventory, software inventory, browser-extension inventory, certificate inventory, hardware/firmware assessment.
- Agent model
- Official/VerifiedUses the Defender endpoint sensor rather than a separate VM agent; emphasizes continuous monitoring over periodic scans.
- Asset inventory
- Official/VerifiedDevice, software, browser-extension, and certificate inventory as part of the Defender telemetry model.
- Risk prioritization
- Official/VerifiedExposure Score, security recommendations, threat intelligence, breach-likelihood/organizational context, and device/security-configuration context.
- Remediation
- Official/VerifiedCreates remediation activities; Microsoft Intune integration can generate remediation tickets/tasks. Zero-day mitigation workflows are also documented.
- ITSM / ticketing integration
- EVULNABLE AssessmentTicketing is primarily through the Microsoft/Intune ecosystem rather than native, vendor-agnostic ServiceNow/Jira workflows — confirm integration depth for non-Microsoft ITSM tools.
- Cloud / container / OT coverage
- Official/VerifiedAgentless vulnerability management for cloud servers, containers, and registries is available through Defender for Cloud.
- Data residency
- Not itemized in source research.
- Pricing
- Published PriceStandalone $3.00/user/month (annual commitment); add-on $2.00/user/month (annual commitment) for eligible Defender for Endpoint Plan 2 / Microsoft 365 E5 customers. Pricing (Published Price) ↗Some core capabilities are already included in other Microsoft Defender plans. Checked August 27, 2026.
- Time to initial data
- EstimatedPotentially hours if Defender is already deployed.
- Typical production rollout
- EstimatedDays to 4 weeks — fast for existing Defender for Endpoint customers; longer for new endpoint onboarding.
- Best-fit company size
- EVULNABLE AssessmentSMB through very large enterprise — especially organizations already standardized on Microsoft 365, Defender for Endpoint, Defender for Servers, Defender XDR, Intune, and Azure/Defender for Cloud.
- Potential limitations / evaluation considerations
- EVULNABLE AssessmentWeakest fit for organizations needing broad non-Windows/non-Defender network-appliance scanning; supported platforms vary in capability depth (Windows, Windows Server, macOS, several Linux distributions, Android, iOS/iPadOS).
Last verified: August 27, 2026
Discover, assess, prioritize, patch, and manage vulnerabilities and misconfigurations across a global hybrid IT environment.
- Gov / FedRAMPYes
- Built-in patchYes*
- Open sourceNo
- DeploymentSaaS, Private platform (limited on-prem-style option)
- Classification
- Traditional enterprise vulnerability management / VMDR / exposure-risk platform. Qualys is treated as the baseline the other platforms are compared against.
- Discovery / scanning
- Official/VerifiedCloud Agents, vulnerability scanners (internal, external, authenticated, PCI), Passive Sensors, Cloud Inventory, Container Inventory/Sensors, Mobile Device Inventory/agents.
- Agent model
- Official/VerifiedQualys Cloud Agent is a lightweight, continuous endpoint sensor — useful for remote/mobile assets that are not reliably present on a corporate network for a traditional scan.
- Asset inventory
- Official/VerifiedA major Qualys strength — discovery/inventory with tagging, searchable attributes, and business/asset-criticality context for unknown and unmanaged assets.
- Risk prioritization
- Official/VerifiedTruRisk, incorporating the Qualys Detection Score (QDS), Asset Criticality Score (ACS), vulnerability/risk factors, and threat intelligence (including CISA KEV, active exploitation, and ransomware association).
- Remediation
- Official/VerifiedVMDR identifies remediation and missing patches; actual patch deployment requires the Qualys Patch Management entitlement, which supports Windows, Linux, macOS, and third-party applications.
- ITSM / ticketing integration
- Official/VerifiedServiceNow integration is specifically documented for tracking/assigning remediation; Jira/ITSM workflows are also documented in broader VMDR/Patch materials.
- Cloud / container / OT coverage
- Official/VerifiedBroad coverage beyond classic servers/workstations — on-prem, cloud, containers, mobile, IoT, and OT (dedicated VMDR OT materials).
- Data residency
- Official/VerifiedRegional Cloud Platforms including US1–US4, GOV1, EU1–EU3, India, Canada, UAE, UK, Australia, Saudi Arabia, and Private Platform options.
- Pricing
- Published PriceVMDR TruRisk from $2,195; TruRisk FixIT from $2,995; TruRisk ProtectIT from $4,645 (SMB packages). Enterprise VMDR pricing is quote-based and per asset. Qualys pricing ↗SMB starting prices only — do not treat as representative of enterprise/global pricing. Checked August 27, 2026.
- Time to initial data
- EstimatedHours to days for initial data once agents/scanners are configured (based on Qualys's documented agent/scanner setup steps).
- Typical production rollout
- Estimated2–8 weeks typical production rollout — large enterprises need agent rollout, scanner placement, auth records, tags, and integrations.
- Best-fit company size
- EVULNABLE AssessmentMid-market through very large global enterprise — large hybrid networks, distributed endpoints, multiple countries, strong compliance requirements, agent + scanner strategy, and mature VM teams wanting asset inventory + VM + patch in one platform.
- Potential limitations / evaluation considerations
- EVULNABLE AssessmentThe breadth of the platform can be operationally complex; licensing can be harder to compare than simpler competitors; patch deployment is entitlement-dependent; large environments need mature tagging/asset-governance discipline.
Sources
Last verified: August 27, 2026
Multi-sensor scanning (cloud, linked/internal scanners, agents) with dynamic threat-driven risk scoring.
- Gov / FedRAMPYes
- Built-in patchYes
- Open sourceNo
- DeploymentSaaS, On-premises (Security Center)
- Classification
- Traditional enterprise VM / exposure-management platform — one of the most direct Qualys competitors.
- Discovery / scanning
- Official/VerifiedCloud Sensors for external scanning, linked/internal scanners, Tenable Agents, and other sensors/connectors.
- Agent model
- Official/VerifiedTenable Agents are host-based sensors for servers, laptops, desktops, and other supported endpoints — useful for transient, offline, remote, or hard-to-reach assets and large-scale low-impact assessment.
- Asset inventory
- Not itemized in source research.
- Risk prioritization
- Official/VerifiedVulnerability Priority Rating (VPR), combining technical impact, threat intelligence, exploit information, and real-world exploitation indicators; dynamic as the threat landscape changes. Tenable standardized on an enhanced VPR v2 model (expanded threat intel + ML context) on July 1, 2026.
- Remediation
- Official/VerifiedTenable Patch Management offers autonomous patching, vulnerability-to-patch correlation, guardrails, SLAs, deployment policies, testing/approval controls, and rollback across Windows, macOS, Linux, and 20,000+ third-party applications (250,000+ unique patches per current vendor claims). Also integrates with patch systems such as Dell KACE, HCL BigFix, Microsoft SCCM, WSUS, Red Hat Satellite, and Symantec Altiris.
- ITSM / ticketing integration
- Not itemized in source research. Confirm current ServiceNow/Jira integration depth directly with Tenable.
- Cloud / container / OT coverage
- Not itemized in source research.
- Data residency
- Official/VerifiedRegional cloud sensors including US East, US West, Singapore, Sydney, Tokyo, Canada, Frankfurt, London, Brazil, Mumbai, EMEA/UAE ranges, a GovCloud/FedRAMP environment, and China-specific sensor connectivity.
- Pricing
- Published Price100 assets — 1 year $3,500, 2 years $6,825, 3 years $9,975. Pricing (Published Price) ↗Verified against Tenable's own pricing page as part of this tab's fact-check pass. Checked August 27, 2026.
- Time to initial data
- EstimatedHours to days.
- Typical production rollout
- Estimated2–6 weeks — scanner/agent architecture and credentials drive the timeline.
- Best-fit company size
- EVULNABLE AssessmentMid-market through very large enterprise — especially organizations familiar with Nessus, hybrid environments, scanner + agent models, on-prem Security Center needs, and regulated/high-security environments.
- Potential limitations / evaluation considerations
- Not itemized in source research.
Sources
Last verified: August 27, 2026
Security Console + distributed Scan Engines, now positioned as the VM engine inside Exposure Command.
- Gov / FedRAMPNot itemized
- Built-in patchNo / integration
- Open sourceNo
- DeploymentSaaS, On-premises (Security Console/engines)
- Classification
- Traditional enterprise vulnerability management, increasingly folded into Rapid7's broader Exposure Command.
- Discovery / scanning
- Official/VerifiedSecurity Console creates sites, configures/runs scans, and manages vulnerability data; Scan Engines (distributable through the enterprise) perform the scans.
- Agent model
- Official/VerifiedRapid7 Agent / Insight Agent provides vulnerability assessment for remote assets outside normal network-scanning reach.
- Asset inventory
- Not itemized in source research.
- Risk prioritization
- Official/VerifiedActive Risk (0–1000 scale) is the current recommended risk strategy, incorporating current CVSS data, threat intelligence, Rapid7 research, AttackerKB, Metasploit, ExploitDB, Project Lorelei, CISA KEV, and third-party dark-web sources. As of January 21, 2026, legacy strategies (RealRisk, Temporal, TemporalPlus, Weighted, PCI ASV 2.0) were deprecated.
- Remediation
- Official/VerifiedDedicated Remediation Projects group solutions, assign responsibility, track progress, aggregate risk by solution, and support verification via paired scan-engine validation scans. Patch execution is generally handled via integrations rather than a native InsightVM patch server.
- ITSM / ticketing integration
- Official/VerifiedJira and ServiceNow are explicitly referenced for remediation workflows.
- Cloud / container / OT coverage
- EVULNABLE AssessmentBroader cloud/exposure coverage is positioned through Exposure Command rather than InsightVM alone; confirm current container/OT scope directly with Rapid7.
- Data residency
- Official/VerifiedSelectable data regions for certain Insight products — United States, Canada, Europe, Japan, and Australia.
- Pricing
- Published Pricestarts at $1.62/asset/month at 500 assets (~$9,720/year for 500 assets before add-ons, services, taxes, or discounts). Pricing (Published Price) ↗Verified against Rapid7's own pricing page as part of this tab's fact-check pass — matched. Checked August 27, 2026.
- Time to initial data
- EstimatedHours to days.
- Typical production rollout
- Estimated2–8 weeks — Security Console, distributed engines, agents, and remediation integrations add setup effort.
- Best-fit company size
- EVULNABLE AssessmentMid-market through large enterprise.
- Potential limitations / evaluation considerations
- Not itemized in source research.
Sources
Last verified: August 27, 2026
Continuous, endpoint-telemetry-driven vulnerability discovery deeply tied to Defender for Endpoint.
- Gov / FedRAMPNot itemized
- Built-in patchNo / integration
- Open sourceNo
- DeploymentSaaS
- Classification
- Endpoint-led vulnerability management, part of the Microsoft Defender / exposure-management ecosystem.
- Discovery / scanning
- Official/VerifiedContinuous discovery via devices onboarded to Defender for Endpoint — device inventory, software inventory, browser-extension inventory, certificate inventory, hardware/firmware assessment.
- Agent model
- Official/VerifiedUses the Defender endpoint sensor rather than a separate VM agent; emphasizes continuous monitoring over periodic scans.
- Asset inventory
- Official/VerifiedDevice, software, browser-extension, and certificate inventory as part of the Defender telemetry model.
- Risk prioritization
- Official/VerifiedExposure Score, security recommendations, threat intelligence, breach-likelihood/organizational context, and device/security-configuration context.
- Remediation
- Official/VerifiedCreates remediation activities; Microsoft Intune integration can generate remediation tickets/tasks. Zero-day mitigation workflows are also documented.
- ITSM / ticketing integration
- EVULNABLE AssessmentTicketing is primarily through the Microsoft/Intune ecosystem rather than native, vendor-agnostic ServiceNow/Jira workflows — confirm integration depth for non-Microsoft ITSM tools.
- Cloud / container / OT coverage
- Official/VerifiedAgentless vulnerability management for cloud servers, containers, and registries is available through Defender for Cloud.
- Data residency
- Not itemized in source research.
- Pricing
- Published PriceStandalone $3.00/user/month (annual commitment); add-on $2.00/user/month (annual commitment) for eligible Defender for Endpoint Plan 2 / Microsoft 365 E5 customers. Pricing (Published Price) ↗Some core capabilities are already included in other Microsoft Defender plans. Checked August 27, 2026.
- Time to initial data
- EstimatedPotentially hours if Defender is already deployed.
- Typical production rollout
- EstimatedDays to 4 weeks — fast for existing Defender for Endpoint customers; longer for new endpoint onboarding.
- Best-fit company size
- EVULNABLE AssessmentSMB through very large enterprise — especially organizations already standardized on Microsoft 365, Defender for Endpoint, Defender for Servers, Defender XDR, Intune, and Azure/Defender for Cloud.
- Potential limitations / evaluation considerations
- EVULNABLE AssessmentWeakest fit for organizations needing broad non-Windows/non-Defender network-appliance scanning; supported platforms vary in capability depth (Windows, Windows Server, macOS, several Linux distributions, Android, iOS/iPadOS).
Last verified: August 27, 2026
Reuses the Falcon sensor to add vulnerability, network, and exposure visibility without deploying another agent.
- Gov / FedRAMPYes
- Built-in patchNo / integration
- Open sourceNo
- DeploymentSaaS
- Classification
- Endpoint-led exposure management / CTEM / vulnerability intelligence / network vulnerability assessment, built on the single-agent Falcon platform.
- Discovery / scanning
- Official/VerifiedVisibility across endpoints, cloud, networks, OT/IoT, external assets, and shadow AI; Network Vulnerability Assessment adds continuous network visibility without waiting for a traditional full rescan. Existing Falcon Exposure Management customers may receive NVA coverage for up to 10% of licensed managed assets, subject to CrowdStrike's stated terms and caps.
- Agent model
- Official/VerifiedSingle Falcon sensor/agent model — a major operational benefit for existing Falcon customers since exposure capability reuses already-deployed telemetry.
- Asset inventory
- Official/VerifiedCAASM/asset-discovery capability as part of the broader exposure-management surface.
- Risk prioritization
- Official/VerifiedExPRT.AI and an Exposure Prioritization Agent, incorporating live telemetry, exploit conditions, asset criticality, real-world threat intelligence, adversary behavior, endpoint/identity/cloud/network context.
- Remediation
- Official/VerifiedAutomated remediation workflows; patch capabilities depend on the broader Falcon ecosystem/offering rather than a dedicated built-in patch server.
- ITSM / ticketing integration
- Not itemized in source research. Confirm current ServiceNow/Jira depth directly with CrowdStrike.
- Cloud / container / OT coverage
- Official/VerifiedCloud security coverage and OT/IoT exposure visibility are both referenced; External Attack Surface Management (EASM) and security configuration assessment are dedicated capabilities.
- Data residency
- Official/VerifiedFedRAMP High authorized government platform; 2026 regional/data-sovereignty expansion announced for Saudi Arabia, India, and UAE.
- Pricing
- Estimatedquote/demo-driven; budget as a five-figure-or-larger annual enterprise purchase depending on endpoint count/modules. Do not treat any specific number as official.No public list price is published.
- Time to initial data
- EstimatedPotentially hours if the Falcon sensor is already deployed.
- Typical production rollout
- EstimatedDays to 4 weeks — existing Falcon customers can realize value quickly; NVA/cloud/ASM expansion adds scope.
- Best-fit company size
- EVULNABLE AssessmentMid-market through very large enterprise — especially existing CrowdStrike customers, CTEM programs, endpoint-heavy estates, and enterprises wanting vulnerability data tied to adversary intelligence.
- Potential limitations / evaluation considerations
- Not itemized in source research.
Sources
Last verified: August 27, 2026
Agentless-first cloud vulnerability visibility built on the Wiz Security Graph.
- Gov / FedRAMPNot itemized
- Built-in patchNo / integration
- Open sourceNo
- DeploymentSaaS
- Classification
- Cloud-native vulnerability management / CNAPP / unified vulnerability aggregation.
- Discovery / scanning
- Official/VerifiedAgentless-first, scanning cloud environments via API connectors; an optional Sensor adds deeper runtime/workload visibility where needed. Wiz's Unified Vulnerability Management page states coverage of 120,000+ vulnerabilities across 40+ operating systems, per current vendor claims.
- Agent model
- Official/VerifiedPrimarily agentless; Sensor available for runtime depth. Can also extend to on-premises via third-party aggregation and the Sensor Workload scanner.
- Asset inventory
- Not itemized in source research.
- Risk prioritization
- Official/VerifiedWiz Security Graph correlates vulnerabilities with internet exposure, identity permissions, data sensitivity, network relationships, cloud misconfigurations, and attack paths. Wiz Threat Center adds rapid visibility into emerging/exploited vulnerabilities.
- Remediation
- Official/VerifiedRemediation guidance, one-click remediation in supported workflows, patch recommendations, ownership identification, CMDB context, workflow routing, and visibility into transitive dependencies/base-image vulnerabilities. Not a traditional endpoint patch server.
- ITSM / ticketing integration
- EVULNABLE AssessmentWorkflow routing/integrations are referenced but not itemized as explicit native ServiceNow/Jira support in this research — confirm current integration list with Wiz.
- Cloud / container / OT coverage
- Official/VerifiedVulnerability coverage across cloud workloads including VMs, serverless, containers, and appliances — a core strength. Can also ingest third-party findings (existing scanners, pen tests, DSPM, SAST, DAST).
- Data residency
- Not itemized in source research.
- Pricing
- Wiz's pricing page states licensing is modular and scales on metrics such as workloads, developers, log ingestion, or sensors depending on product. No simple public per-asset VM price should be assumed. Pricing (Official/Verified) ↗Do not invent a flat per-asset number for Wiz.
- Time to initial data
- EstimatedOften minutes/hours for a first cloud inventory after connecting a cloud account.
- Typical production rollout
- EstimatedDays to 4 weeks — the agentless architecture speeds cloud onboarding; workflow integration takes longer.
- Best-fit company size
- EVULNABLE AssessmentMid-market through very large enterprise with significant cloud infrastructure.
- Potential limitations / evaluation considerations
- EVULNABLE AssessmentNot designed to replace classic network-appliance/legacy on-prem scanning; no simple public per-asset VM price is published, which complicates budget comparison.
Last verified: August 27, 2026
Agentless SideScanning across cloud configuration and workload runtime storage, with attack-path and reachability context.
- Gov / FedRAMPYes
- Built-in patchNo / integration
- Open sourceNo
- DeploymentSaaS
- Classification
- Cloud-native vulnerability management / CNAPP.
- Discovery / scanning
- Official/VerifiedAgentless-first SideScanning collects cloud configuration and workload runtime block-storage data without a traditional VM agent on every workload; an optional Orca Sensor adds dynamic runtime reachability analysis. Orca states it uses 20+ vulnerability data sources.
- Agent model
- Official/VerifiedAgentless-first; Orca Sensor optional for deeper runtime visibility.
- Asset inventory
- Official/VerifiedInventories OS packages, applications, libraries, versions, cloud configurations, IAM, sensitive data, malware, and lateral-movement risk alongside vulnerabilities.
- Risk prioritization
- Official/VerifiedCombines vulnerability findings with internet exposure, cloud configuration, IAM permissions, data sensitivity, workload relationships, and Attack Path Analysis; Agentless and Dynamic Runtime Reachability Analysis identify whether vulnerable packages are actually exploitable/executing. A "From the News" capability surfaces breaking/trending CVEs.
- Remediation
- Official/VerifiedIntegrations with Jira, ServiceNow, Slack, PagerDuty, OpsGenie, Splunk, QRadar, SOAR platforms, and CI/CD/code repositories.
- ITSM / ticketing integration
- Official/VerifiedServiceNow and Jira are both explicitly listed among Orca's integrations.
- Cloud / container / OT coverage
- Official/VerifiedCloud-workload-centric coverage; not positioned as a traditional network-scanner replacement for on-prem/OT environments.
- Data residency
- Official/VerifiedTrust Center lists FedRAMP Moderate, GDPR-related controls, ISO 27001/27017/27018/27701, PCI DSS, SOC 2, CSA STAR, and GovRAMP.
- Pricing
- Commercial pricing is quote/demo-driven. Do not assume or invent a public list price.No published price available.
- Time to initial data
- EstimatedOften minutes/hours after connecting a cloud account.
- Typical production rollout
- EstimatedDays to 4 weeks — agentless SideScanning simplifies initial cloud deployment.
- Best-fit company size
- EVULNABLE AssessmentMid-market through global enterprise with meaningful cloud workloads.
- Potential limitations / evaluation considerations
- EVULNABLE AssessmentNot a traditional network scanner; commercial pricing is quote/demo-driven with no public list price.
Last verified: August 27, 2026
Risk aggregation / prioritization / orchestration
Ivanti Neurons for Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
Ingests findings from 100+ sources (scanners, AppSec tools, pen tests, business data) into one prioritized remediation view.
- Gov / FedRAMPNot itemized
- Built-in patchNo / integration
- Open sourceNo
- DeploymentSaaS
- Classification
- Risk-based vulnerability aggregation, normalization, prioritization, and remediation orchestration — must not be mislabeled as simply another network vulnerability scanner.
- Discovery / scanning
- Official/VerifiedDoes not scan directly — it continuously correlates infrastructure information, vulnerability data, threat intelligence, manual pen-test findings, research findings, and business asset criticality from other systems.
- Agent model
- N/A — aggregation layer, not a scanning agent. Ingests via connectors from source systems (e.g. Qualys VM/VMDR, Tenable, Rapid7 InsightVM/Nexpose, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon Spotlight, Orca, Wiz, Veracode, Checkmarx, Snyk, Fortify, ServiceNow, and others — 100+ sources per vendor claims).
- Asset inventory
- Not itemized in source research.
- Risk prioritization
- Official/VerifiedVulnerability Risk Rating (VRR) and Ivanti RS3 organizational risk scoring, plus playbooks, SLA automation, automated due dates, notifications, threat views, custom dashboards, role-based access, and workflow automation.
- Remediation
- Official/VerifiedSends prioritized vulnerabilities via API into Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management.
- ITSM / ticketing integration
- Not itemized in source research. Ivanti markets connectors/workflow automation broadly; confirm exact ServiceNow/Jira depth directly.
- Cloud / container / OT coverage
- EVULNABLE AssessmentCoverage depends entirely on which source systems are connected — Ivanti itself does not natively scan cloud, containers, or OT.
- Data residency
- Not itemized in source research.
- Pricing
- Quote-based. Estimated: budget as an enterprise risk-management/orchestration layer; final cost depends heavily on asset volume, modules, and bundled Ivanti products.No published list price available.
- Time to initial data
- EstimatedDays, after first connector ingestion.
- Typical production rollout
- Estimated2–8+ weeks — quality depends on connector setup, normalization, business context, and workflow design.
- Best-fit company size
- EVULNABLE AssessmentLarge and very large enterprise, especially organizations with multiple vulnerability scanners, AppSec scanners, pen-test findings, cloud-security tools, multiple business units, and a need for one normalized enterprise risk view.
- Potential limitations / evaluation considerations
- EVULNABLE AssessmentValue depends heavily on the quality/breadth of connected source systems; not a substitute for an underlying scanner.
Last verified: August 27, 2026
Vulnerability scanning plus built-in Enterprise-edition patch management, priced for SMB/mid-market budgets.
- Gov / FedRAMPNot itemized
- Built-in patchYes
- Open sourceNo
- DeploymentSaaS, On-premises
- Classification
- Endpoint-centric vulnerability management with built-in remediation/patching.
- Discovery / scanning
- Official/VerifiedVulnerability scanning/assessment across managed Windows, macOS, and Linux endpoints (including roaming/remote users), plus network-device scanning in applicable configurations.
- Agent model
- Official/VerifiedAgent-based management of endpoints across Windows, macOS, and Linux.
- Asset inventory
- Not itemized in source research.
- Risk prioritization
- Official/VerifiedAI/ML-driven prioritization using CVSS, EPSS, exploitability, threat intelligence, active attack trends, patch availability, affected systems, and vulnerability timelines.
- Remediation
- Official/VerifiedEnterprise Edition includes built-in patch management — patch download, testing, deployment, automated deployment across multiple OSs, 1,500+ third-party applications, BIOS/driver updates in relevant workflows, Linux patching, Microsoft 365 deployment, and zero-day mitigation scripts.
- ITSM / ticketing integration
- Not itemized in source research.
- Cloud / container / OT coverage
- Official/VerifiedNetwork-device management/scanning and firmware-vulnerability visibility in Enterprise/on-premises configurations — confirm exact device/vendor coverage during procurement. Limited cloud/container/OT scope relative to CNAPP-style vendors.
- Data residency
- Official/VerifiedAvailable as both cloud and on-premises deployment.
- Pricing
- Published Price (100 computers/1 technician): Professional — on-prem annual $695, cloud annual $895. Enterprise — on-prem annual $1,195, cloud annual $1,545. Product page also lists Professional from ~$0.90/device/month and Enterprise from ~$1.55/device/month. Pricing (Published Price) ↗Confirm current tier pricing directly — ManageEngine updates pricing pages periodically. Checked August 27, 2026.
- Time to initial data
- EstimatedHours to days.
- Typical production rollout
- EstimatedDays to 3 weeks — agent rollout and patch policies are the main effort.
- Best-fit company size
- EVULNABLE AssessmentSMB through mid-market; potentially larger cost-conscious enterprises with endpoint-focused requirements.
- Potential limitations / evaluation considerations
- EVULNABLE AssessmentLimited compared with CNAPP-style cloud/container coverage; best suited to endpoint-centric environments rather than large heterogeneous global estates.
Last verified: August 27, 2026
The OpenVAS Scanner engine, available as free open-source Community Edition or as a commercial Greenbone appliance/feed.
- Gov / FedRAMPNot itemized
- Built-in patchNo / integration
- Open sourceYes
- DeploymentOn-premises, Self-hosted / air-gapped
- Classification
- Open-source/self-hosted vulnerability scanning and vulnerability management.
- Discovery / scanning
- Official/VerifiedThe OpenVAS Scanner executes vulnerability tests against target systems, drawing on the Greenbone Community Feed or the commercial Greenbone Enterprise Feed (200,000+ vulnerability tests per current vendor claims).
- Agent model
- Official/VerifiedPrimarily a network-scanner architecture, not an agent/CNAPP-style agentless-cloud model.
- Asset inventory
- Not itemized in source research.
- Risk prioritization
- Official/VerifiedSeverity/prioritization is driven by the vulnerability tests themselves rather than a proprietary composite risk score like TruRisk or VPR.
- Remediation
- EVULNABLE AssessmentNo integrated enterprise patch-deployment capability comparable to Qualys/Tenable/ManageEngine — remediation is handled outside the product.
- ITSM / ticketing integration
- EVULNABLE AssessmentExternal/integration-dependent — not natively itemized in source research.
- Cloud / container / OT coverage
- Not itemized in source research.
- Data residency
- Official/VerifiedSelf-hosted/on-premises by design, which is attractive where cloud SaaS is prohibited, data must remain local, or full control of scanner infrastructure is desired. Greenbone states its products are used in more than 150 countries.
- Pricing
- Published PriceOPENVAS BASIC (entry-level enterprise product) — €2,524/year. The underlying Greenbone Community Edition / OpenVAS stack is open source and free to run, though operating it still incurs infrastructure and labor costs.Verified against Greenbone's own product page as part of this tab's fact-check pass — matched; the OPENVAS BASIC price is a flat annual fee, not per-asset. Checked August 27, 2026.
- Time to initial data
- EstimatedHours to days.
- Typical production rollout
- EstimatedDays to 3 weeks — simple scanner setup can be quick, but tuning/scaling/credentials require expertise.
- Best-fit company size
- EVULNABLE AssessmentSmall and mid-size organizations, labs, security researchers, privacy-conscious environments, organizations with Linux/security-engineering expertise, and teams needing a lower-cost self-hosted scanner.
- Potential limitations / evaluation considerations
- EVULNABLE AssessmentNo modern CNAPP-style agentless cloud graph, no integrated enterprise patch deployment, and a scanner-only feature set relative to full-suite competitors; running it (even the free Community Edition) still has infrastructure and labor costs.
Last verified: August 27, 2026
